Hoş Geldin!

Bize kaydolarak topluluğumuzun diğer üyeleriyle tartışabilir, paylaşabilir ve özel mesaj gönderebilirsiniz.

Şimdi Kaydolun!

What was the main point of disagreement between the Federalist and Antifederalist?

Editör

Yeni Üye
Katılım
7 Mart 2024
Mesajlar
50.634
Çözümler
1
Tepkime puanı
1
Puan
36

What was the main point of disagreement between the Federalist and Antifederalist?​

The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.

What were the arguments of the Federalist and Antifederalist?​

Federalists believed that a stronger national government would improve relationships between states and help create, as the Constitution stated, a “more perfect union.” Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, worried that a federal government with more power would be prone to tyranny.

What was the key argument made by the Antifederalist?​

What was the key argument made by the Antifederalist?
Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments. Many felt that the federal government would be too far removed to represent the average citizen.

What did Antifederalist want included in the Constitution?​

What did Antifederalist want included in the Constitution?
The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression.

Do you think the Federalists or the Anti-Federalists had the more valid arguments?​

Even though the Antifederalists had a strong argument with there list of reasons possible abuses of powers and Letters from the Federal Farmer, I believe that the Federalists had a more valid argument. This can be seen by the amount of support they receive from highly respected individuals at this time and others.

What is the difference between Federalists and Anti-Federalists quizlet?​

The Federalists supported the Constitution and wanted a stronger national government. The Antifederalists opposed the Constitution because they wanted more power to remain with the states.

What were the three main ideas in the Federalist Papers?​

What were the three main ideas in the Federalist Papers?
Five basic themes can be discerned from the words of Hamilton, Madison, and Jay: federalism, checks and balances, separated powers, pluralism, and representation. Although the papers deal with different parts of the government, as noted above, these themes are fairly consistent throughout the collection.

What was the major legacy left behind by the Anti-Federalist?​

What was the major legacy left behind by the Anti-Federalist?
What was the major legacy left behind by the Antifederalist? In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court first asserted the power of judiciary review by declaring an act of Congress unconstitutional.

What was the Federalists main argument?​

Federalists battled for adoption of the Constitution They favored weaker state governments, a strong centralized government, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative, rather than direct, democracy.

What were the three main ideas in The Federalist Papers?​

Why did the Anti-Federalists insist on a bill of rights?​

Why did the Anti-Federalists insist on a bill of rights?
Antifederalists responded that a bill of rights was needed to protect such basic liberties as freedom of speech and religion. Unless these rights were spelled out, they could be too easily ignored or denied by the government.

In which state was anti federalism most popular?​

In which state was anti federalism most popular?
The Anti-Federalists were strong in the key states of Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia. In North Carolina and Rhode Island they prevented ratification of the Constitution until after the new government had been established.

What is the difference between Federalist and Anti-Federalist?​

Those who supported the Constitution and a stronger national republic were known as Federalists. Those who opposed the ratification of the Constitution in favor of small localized government were known as Anti-Federalists.

Who was an Anti-Federalist?​

Anti-Federalists, in early U.S. history, a loose political coalition of popular politicians, such as Patrick Henry, who unsuccessfully opposed the strong central government envisioned in the U.S. Constitution of 1787 and whose agitations led to the addition of a Bill of Rights.

What is the main argument of the Federalist Papers?​

What is the main argument of the Federalist Papers?
In the Federalist Papers, Hamilton, Jay and Madison argued that the decentralization of power that existed under the Articles of Confederation prevented the new nation from becoming strong enough to compete on the world stage, or to quell internal insurrections such as Shays’s Rebellion.
 
Federalistlar ve Antifederalistler arasındaki temel anlaşmazlık noktası, Federalistlerin güçlü bir hükümet ve güçlü bir yürütme kolunu istemesine karşın, Antifederalistlerin daha zayıf bir merkezi hükümet istemesidir. Federalistler bir haklar bildirgesi istemezken —yenı anayasanın yeterli olduğunu düşündüler; Antifederalistler bir haklar bildirgesi talep ettiler.

Federalistler, daha güçlü bir ulusal hükümetin eyaletler arasındaki ilişkileri güçlendireceğine ve Anayasa'nın belirttiği gibi daha "mükemmel bir birlik" oluşturacağına inanıyordu. Diğer yandan, Antifederalistler, daha fazla güce sahip bir federal hükümetin despotizme eğilimli olacağından endişe duyuyorlardı.

Antifederalistler, Anayasa'nın federal hükümete fazla güç verdiğini, eyalet ve yerel hükümetlerden fazla güç aldığını savunuyordu. Birçok kişi, federal hükümetin ortalama vatandaşı temsil etmekten çok uzak olacağını düşünüyordu.

Antifederalistler, Anayasa'nın merkezi hükümete fazla güç verdiğini iddia ettiler ve Haklar Bildirisi olmadan halkın baskıya maruz kalacağını savundular.

Federalistler, Anayasanın kabul edilmesi için savaştılar. Onlar, zayıf eyalet hükümetlerini destekledi, güçlü merkezi hükümeti savundu, dolaylı seçimle hükümet yetkililerini tercih etti, görevliler için daha uzun süreli sınırlar istedi ve temsilci, doğrudan demokrasiye tercih etti.

Haklar Bildirisi olmaksızın, Antifederalistler söz konusu temel özgürlükleri korumak için bir haklar bildirgesinin gerekliliğini savundular. Bu haklar belirtilmediği sürece, bunların hükümet tarafından kolayca göz ardı edilebileceği veya reddedilebileceği iddia edildi.

Antifederalistler, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri tarihinde, Patrick Henry gibi popüler politikacıların yer aldığı, 1787 ABD Anayasası'nda öngörülen güçlü merkezi hükümete karşı başarısız bir şekilde karşı çıkan ve bu karışıklıkların Haklar Bildirgesi eklenmesine yol açan gevşek bir siyasi koalisyondu.
 
Geri
Üst